“I failed 10 times...”: the rise of “vulnerability posts” 🤢
Why this trend exists & how devs can be authentic (without the cringe).
Scroll through your LinkedIn feed right now.
I bet you’ll see at least one. A post that starts with a personal confession. A story about a dramatic failure, a moment of deep self-doubt, or a tearful breakdown. These “vulnerability posts” are everywhere.
They often follow a simple formula:
A deeply personal, often sad, opening line.
A long story of struggle.
A vague, inspirational lesson at the end.
...and somehow, thousands of likes and comments.
As a software developer, you look at this and probably think, “What does this have to do with my job? I just want to build cool stuff. Do I really have to post a selfie of myself crying to get noticed?” 🤯
It’s a fair question. Let’s talk about why this trend is happening, and more importantly, how you as a developer can be “authentic” without being cringey.
The trend: why is your feed full of personal drama? 📱
First, let’s understand the “why.” It’s not because everyone suddenly decided to overshare their private life.
It’s simpler. The algorithm.
LinkedIn’s algorithm is designed to do one thing: keep you on the platform. It promotes content that gets high engagement (likes, comments, shares). And what gets massive engagement?
Emotion.
A post about a new JavaScript framework might get a few nods from other devs. A post about overcoming a deep personal failure gets everyone talking. This has created a sort of “arms race” for engagement, pushing content to become more and more personal, and sometimes... just plain weird.
The developer’s dilemma: “do I have to do this too?” 🤯
This leaves logical, problem-solving people like us in a strange position.
We are taught to value precision, facts, and code that works. Our world is about solutions, not about drama. So when we’re told that “personal branding” means posting about our “darkest moments,” it feels completely fake.
It feels like selling out.
And here’s the good news: you don’t have to do it.
But... you should pay attention to the principle behind the trend. The reason those posts work (even the cringey ones) is because they show vulnerability. People are tired of perfect, polished success stories. They want to see the real, messy process.
And as a developer, your “messy process” is your most powerful, authentic asset.
The authentic alternative: share your process, not your problems 💡
You don’t need to tell the world about your personal life. But you can—and should—tell the world about your professional challenges.
That is the developer’s version of vulnerability.
Don’t share: A story about how you felt depressed.
Do share: A story about the bug that took you 3 days to solve and made you question your sanity.
Don’t share: A vague inspirational quote about “failure.”
Do share: The story of an architectural decision you made that turned out to be wrong, and what you learned from refactoring it.
Why is this so much better?
It’s authentic to you. You’re talking about your actual work.
It’s incredibly valuable. Every other developer has been stuck on a bug. They will relate to your struggle and learn from your solution.
It builds real credibility. It shows recruiters that you’re not just a code-monkey; you’re a resilient problem-solver who can learn from mistakes.
This is how you build a powerful brand. Not by faking emotion, but by showing your real, technical process.
How to tell a “developer story” (a simple, non-cringe template) ✍️
So, how do you write a post like this? Use this simple, 4-part structure.
1. The Problem: Start with the technical challenge, straight up.
“I spent all of Tuesday fighting a bizarre memory leak in our new Go service.”
2. The Hurdle (The “vulnerability”): Briefly describe the frustration. This is the human part.
“My usual debugging tricks weren’t working. I was completely stuck, and my metrics were all over the place. Honestly, it was pretty frustrating.”
3. The “Aha!” Moment: What was the breakthrough?
“After stepping away for an hour, I finally realized the problem wasn’t in my code, but in how we were (mis)using a specific flag in the Docker networking config...”
4. The Lesson: What did you learn that others can use?
“My main takeaway: when a bug seems impossible, it’s often not your code. It’s time to check your assumptions about the environment. Hope this saves someone else a headache!”
This kind of post is human, helpful, and 100% professional. It’s the ultimate “vulnerability post” for a developer.
What if people criticize me? (handling the feedback loop) 🛡️
Okay, let’s talk about the biggest fear. You post your “developer story” about a 3-day bug, and someone in the comments writes: “That’s a stupid solution. You should have just used [X] and finished it in 10 minutes.”
Ouch. 😬
That’s the moment the imposter syndrome comes roaring back, and you want to delete the post.
Here’s the reframe: this is not a test, it’s a conversation. The way you handle that comment is now part of your personal brand.
If the feedback is constructive (but blunt): This is a win! You just got free advice.
Your move: Thank them publicly. “That’s a great point! I hadn’t considered [X]. I’ll definitely look into that for next time. Thanks for sharing!”
The signal you send: You are not an arrogant know-it-all. You are a collaborative, secure developer who is open to learning. This is a massive “green flag” 🟢 for any recruiter or team lead.
If the feedback is just a troll (just “you’re stupid” with no value):
Your move: Ignore them. Delete their comment. Block them.
The signal you send: You don’t feed the trolls, and you maintain a professional, high-quality discussion space.
When you show you can handle technical feedback gracefully and professionally, you build more trust than your original post did alone. You’re showing the most valuable “soft skill” of all: having no ego.
The verdict: vulnerability vs. oversharing (the fine line) 🚫
So, yes, “vulnerability” is a key to building an authentic brand on LinkedIn.
But you don’t need to share your personal problems to do it. That’s oversharing.
Real, professional vulnerability for a developer is about being honest about the process of building things. It’s about sharing your technical challenges, your debugging journeys, and the lessons you learn from being wrong.
Stop worrying about the cringey trends.
Start sharing your real work. That’s far more interesting, and infinitely more valuable.


